Legal Opinion

Corcoran v. Ward

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1931No. Docket No. 7834PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Two separate actions were brought to recover for personal injuries sustained by Marie F. Corcoran and Aleta Jennings, respectively, and these actions were consolidated for the purpose of trial. Judgment upon two verdicts for $30,000 each were entered and appeals .by defendants from both judgments are presented on one transcript.

At the outset we deem it appropriate to state that appellants’ brief contains no. topical index and fails to present each point separately under an appropriate heading showing the nature of the question to be presented as required by rule VIII of the Rules of the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bixby v. AyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Anderson v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Roselle v. BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Dawson v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Rudat v. CarithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API