Legal Opinion · Dissent

Joseph v. Bates

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 29, 1943No. 7990Published

1DissentEvans, Circuit Judge

The point of our difference may be clarified and stressed, if we state the propositions upon which we agree. They are:(a) The “statutory double liability” of national bank stockholders, 12 U.S.C.A. § 64, evidences a long established public policy, the object of which was to protect the depositors of national banks.(b) This statute has been construed to include stockholders of record who are not the real owners of the bank stock. Matteson v. Dent, 176 U.S. 521, 20 S.Ct. 419, 44 L.Ed. 571; Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Barrett, 7 Cir., 131 F.2d 745, decided Dec. 4, 1942; Keyser v. Hitz, 133…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Keyser v. HitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Pauly v. State Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Matteson v. DentSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Early v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Forrest v. JackSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API