Legal Opinion · Dissent

Castle v. Castle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 19, 1971No. 70-703Published

1DissentWalden, Judge

The majority says, without reservation, restriction, or qualification, that the courts of this state cannot, as a matter of jurisdiction, adjudicate the custody of a minor child where such child is not physically present within the state during the pen-dency of the case. While this broad and unequivocal pronouncement provides a ready disposition of this appeal, it is my judgment respectfully advanced that such is neither the law nor should it be. This statement, if permitted to stand, will propo-gate a lonely, unnecessary and dangerously poor precedent in child custody cases.

The correct…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Minick v. MinickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Chisholm v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Beckmann v. BeckmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. Dorman v. FriendlySupreme Court of Florida · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API