Castle v. Castle
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentWalden, Judge
The majority says, without reservation, restriction, or qualification, that the courts of this state cannot, as a matter of jurisdiction, adjudicate the custody of a minor child where such child is not physically present within the state during the pen-dency of the case. While this broad and unequivocal pronouncement provides a ready disposition of this appeal, it is my judgment respectfully advanced that such is neither the law nor should it be. This statement, if permitted to stand, will propo-gate a lonely, unnecessary and dangerously poor precedent in child custody cases.
The correct…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Minick v. MinickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Chisholm v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Beckmann v. BeckmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Dorman v. FriendlySupreme Court of Florida · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.