Legal Opinion
Electrolux Corp. v. Val-Worth, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 18, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtRabiN, J.
The plaintiff is the manufacturer of the well-known “Electrolux” vacuum cleaner. The appealing defendants are Solomon Sacks doing business as “ Famous Vacuum Shops ” and “ Famous Appliance Shops ”, and Vacuum Cleaner Conservation Company, Inc. (hereinafter called “ Conservation ”) of which corporation Sacks is the president and principal stockholder.
Since 1948 Conservation has been buying from the plaintiff and others, quantities of traded-in Electrolux vacuum cleaners of a discontinued model. With plaintiff’s knowledge, Conservation would then recondition the cleaners and resell them as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. . ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Reporters' Ass'n of America v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- General Electric Co. v. Masters, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Quinby & Co. v. FunstonNew York Supreme Court · 1958