Fortino v. Hersh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered August 19, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, granted the motion of defendants Mitchell Hersh and The Burns Agency for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action of plaintiffs Camille Fortino, Anthony Fortino and Toni Ann Fortino (the plaintiff relatives) for breach of fiduciary duty, reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the plaintiff relatives’ breach of fiduciary duty cause of action reinstated.
The motion court erred in finding that the plaintiff relatives failed to set forth admissible…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Murphy v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Batas v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- B & M Linen, Corp. v. Kannegiesser, USA, Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Vic Char Realty, Inc. v. Alliance Plus, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Scotto Princeton LLC v. Felsen Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2005
- Vestal v. PontilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018