Legal Opinion

NRG Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 22, 1994No. Nos. 671-86L, 672-86LPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDEWELT, Judge.

I

In these consolidated actions, plaintiffs, NRG Company, Mike T. Gustafson, William H. Lang, Bellford & Co., Cormorant Corp., Wesco Resources, Inc., and Thermal Energy, Inc., seek payments from the United States for damages they allegedly suffered as a result of the enactment of federal legislation that prompted the cancellation of three mineral prospecting permits owned by plaintiffs. The permits in issue covered land on the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation in Montana. During trial, plaintiffs alleged that the legislation that cancelled their permits constituted a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. NRG Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API