Legal Opinion

Lanza v. Estate of Hillman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1938No. 26904. Department OnePublished

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

This is a suit on a promissory note. The complaint alleged the execution and delivery, for a valuable consideration, by the Hillman Investment Company and C. D. Hillman of their promissory note payable to H. L. Hillman, a brother of C. D. Hillman, and its endorsement by the payee, for value and before maturity, to the plaintiff. The note, for six thousand dollars, purports to have been signed January 10, 1931, was payable five years after date, bore interest at the rate of six per cent, payable annually, and provided that, if interest was not paid as provided, the whole sum of both principal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pugh v. DoupeWashington Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API