Legal Opinion

Keene v. Newark Watch Case Material Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendant, The Newark Watch Case Material Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the-plain tiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 1st day of May, 1905, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court after a trial at the New York Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

At the end of the testimony.counsel for the defendant moved for the direction of a verdict", and asked, if that motion was denied, that the defendant he permitted .to go to the jury. That motion was denied, and counsel for the plaintiff moved for the direction of a verdict for the plaintiff, which was granted. The.' defendant made no request to submit arty specific ’ question to- the jury.. The action was based upon a contract, a. copy of which was annexed'to the answer of the defendant, and a bond given by the" defendant-to secure the performance of that contract, a copy of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keene v. Newark Watch Case Material Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Keene v. Newark Watch Cash Material Co.New York Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charles H. Brown Paint Co. v. ReinhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API