Legal Opinion

Smith v. Simonarson, Visser, Zender, Brandt & Thurston

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 8, 1990No. 23666-1-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, C.J.

Gary Smith appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in Smith's malpractice action against Philip Brandt and the law firm of Simonarson, Visser, Zender, Brandt & Thurston. Smith contends that the trial court erred in finding that recording his judgment would have been a useless act under both CR 62(a) and the bankruptcy code. We agree.

In May 1985, Gary Smith retained Philip Brandt of the law firm of Simonarson, Visser, Zender, Brandt & Thurston *514to enforce his rights against Sharon Dralle as a creditor under a real estate contract. Dralle was behind in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Homann v. HuberWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Mahalko v. Arctic Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Anastos v. M. J. D. M. Truck Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  4. Mahalko v. Arctic Trading Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. PedersenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API