Legal Opinion

Gifford v. Ammer

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 3, 1898No. 153Published

Error from Phillips district court; A. C. T. Geiger, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McElroy, J. :

This action was' brought by one T. G. Watros against Ansel Gifford, the plaintiff in efror, for the recovery of $546.06, which the plaintiff claimed *366to have paid on a supersedeas bond which he signed as surety for Gifford. The plaintiff alleged in his petition that one Bert Oleson recovered a judgment in the district court of Winneshiek county, Iowa, against Ansel Gifford for $3E0 damages and $137 costs, from which judgment Gifford appealed to the supreme court; that at the request of Gifford this plaintiff became surety on his appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whittaker v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API