Francis Daniel Paluca v. Secretary of Labor, Francis Daniel Paluca v. Secretary of Labor
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
We are required to determine the scope of judicial review under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (“FECA”). 5 U.S.C. §§ 8101 et seq. Specifically, we must consider whether Section 8128(b) of the FECA 1 prohibits courts from reviewing policy or rulemaking decisions of the Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”) for conformance to the FECA, and whether that provision divests courts of authority to hear constitutional challenges to the Secretary’s decisions under the FECA. We conclude that § 8128(b) does preclude judicial review of the merits of policy or rulemaking…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Annamma A. Ezekiel and Al Ezekiel v. Jaime T. Michel and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Merrill Benton v. United States of America and the United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- McBryde v. Committee to Review Circuit Council Conduct & Disability Orders of the Judicial Conference of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Werner R. Staacke v. United States Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Gregory R. Czerkies v. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration and Office of Workers Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.