Legal Opinion

Anspaugh v. Dougherty

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1941No. 35,056PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action by the payee of a note against the makers to recover the balance due thereon after a bank, to which the payee had pledged the endorsed note as collateral security for his indebtedness to the bank, had sued the makers and obtained judgment against them in the amount the payee then owed the bank.

After the pleadings were made up defendants made application to the court for the determination of questions of law prior to trial. No final judgment has been rendered in the case. In order to present a comprehensive view of what…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisville Bridge Co. v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Price v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. First National Bank v. SchrubenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Bolen Coal Co. v. Whittaker Brick Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. Farmers' State Bank v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kearny County Bank v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Todd v. Central Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. White v. ToombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Home State Bank v. P. B. Hoidale Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. Fiscus v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API