Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Doane

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 2, 2001No. ACM 33234Published

1ConcurrenceBurd, Judge

I agree completely with the lead opinion written by our Chief Judge. I write separately merely to take issue with the suggestion in Senior Judge Spisak’s opinion, concurring in part and dissenting in part, that the portion of our decision in United States v. Ozores, 53 M.J. 670 (A.F.Ct.Crim.App.2000), which addresses United States v. Rock, 52 M.J. 154 (1999) should be overruled. Such action is unnecessary since the comments in Ozores about Rock are dictum. The issue in Ozores was sufficiency of credit awarded for an Article 13, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 813, violation. We ruled it was without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. RockCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. OzoresUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API