Legal Opinion

Easton v. Medema

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1929No. Docket No. 75, Calendar No. 34,158PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff brought suit against defend-

ants to recover damages alleged to have resulted from the negligent operation of an automobile by defendant Medema which belonged to defendant Carbine. Carbine owned a store in Muskegon. Medema worked for him. Plaintiff was 5 years and 8 months old when injured, September 21, 1926, and a pupil in the Muskegon schools. Medema, the day of the accident, took the automobile near the store and started home. Plaintiff was on' her way to school, but, attracted by Muskegon fire equipment going in an opposite direction, had turned and followed it some distance,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hargreaves v. DeaconMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. McDonough v. VozzelaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. McMahon v. Northern Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  5. Morrison v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baker v. AltMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Morris v. RadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Tyler v. WeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Benedict v. RinnaMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Monison v. McCoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API