Harris v. Walls

OPINION

COLIN STIRLING BRUCE, U.S. District Judge.

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se from his incarceration in Menard Correctional Center, claims that Defendants retaliated against him for pursuing a lawsuit challenging the alleged excessive soy in the prison diet and for helping other inmates *1094file prison grievances seeking a soy-free diet.

Defendants move for summary judgment. Because a rational juror could not find that Defendants retaliated against Plaintiff for Plaintiffs exercise of a protected First Amendment right, the motion will be granted. Defendants took their actions because they…