Legal Opinion
Ragland v. City of Milwaukee
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided April 20, 2015No. Case No. 13-C-1118PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge.
Devin Ragland claims that three officers of the Milwaukee Police Department— Amy Bartol, Stephanie Seitz; and Douglas Anderer — subjected him to unreasonable searches in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and are hable for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 In addition to suing these officers, Ragland sues the City of Milwaukee for municipal liability under § 1983. Before me now is the defendants’ motion for *962summary judgment.2 I must grant the motion if the defendants show that “there is no genuine dispute as to any…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cornell O. Smith v. Randall BruceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
- Taylor v. ZensDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022