Legal Opinion

State v. Proctor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1989No. 10-86-04013; CA A42430PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

This case is a companion to State v. Boots, 94 Or App 713, 767 P2d 450 (1989). The facts of the case are summarized in that opinion. Defendant raises two assignments of error identical to assignments disposed of in the companion case. We affirm on those assignments, which concern alleged violations of defendant’s speedy trial rights and the submission of the case to a second grand jury without leave of court.

Defendant also assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to exclude the expert testimony of Charles H. Vaughn relating to his collection and identification of high velocity blood spatter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. Kuehl v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. BootsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. PaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. State v. BootsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. MinnieweatherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API