Legal Opinion

Maycock v. White

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1934No. 5376PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, C. J.

The plaintiff, Maycock, brought this action against the defendants White as principal and the Indemnity Insurance Company as surety on a surety bond. It is alleged in the complaint that, in pursuance of chapter 38, Laws of Utah 1929, White was granted a license by the state agriculture board to engage in the business of a produce dealer as by the act provided and in accordance therewith gave a surety bond in the sum of $2,500 conditioned that White would make full and complete settlement for any produce, as in the act defined, “handled by him”; that White in virtue of the license was engaged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. State v. LathamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Carstensen v. StrattonUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API