Legal Opinion

Burns v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant was indicted and convicted for having made á “mash, wort, or wash fit for and to be used in the distillation of alcoholic, vinous, malt, spirituous, and fermented liquors,” and has appealed. No brief was filed on behalf of appellant; but the Attorney General has set out and discussed all the assignments of error contained in the motion for a new trial. These are, chiefly, that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain a conviction; and that error was committed in admitting testimony. These assignments of error will be discussed together.

The sheriff, accompanied by three deputies,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rinehart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API