Legal Opinion

Street v. Dexter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1938No. 27624PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The defendant in error, as plaintiff, instituted his action against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, to quiet title to certain real estate in Love county. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff claims title to the land by virtue of an unrecorded warranty deed, from E. M. Proctor and Nettie Proctor, and G. V. Pardue, and also quitclaim deed from A. J. Walters and Mary J. Walters. The last-named grantors’ interest in the land is based on a deed from the chairman of the board of county commissioners of Love county.

In his petition plaintiff alleges…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hirsch Bros. & Co. v. R. E. Kennington Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Griffin v. GalbraithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co. v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Nohl v. HollowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Hatfield v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brashears v. CollisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Sheffel v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API