Legal Opinion

Cucco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 14, 1978No. 77-113PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALDERMAN, Chief Judge.

In this revocation of probation case the defendant contends that he was denied due process of law. We reverse.

The State alleged that the defendant violated his probation by failing to live and remain at liberty without violating any law in that he committed grand larceny by participating in the theft of 35 rolls of barbed wire. The defendant denied this charge and a trial was held. At the conclusion of the hearing the trial judge stated:

It is my factual conclusion that the defendant Cucco is not guilty of grand larceny; but is guilty of participating in the sale of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Frederick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Warr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Evans v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API