Houck v. Ashland
Oregon Supreme Court
From Jackson: Hiero K. Hana, Judge. Jesse Houck and Joseph Dame were convicted of violating an ordinance against selling intoxicating liquors without a license, and appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean
The appellants were convicted in the Recorder’s Court of the City of Ashland of violating “an ordinance declaring the illegality of keeping or maintaining a barroom, drinking shop, drinking saloon, tippling-house, clubhouse, or clubroom, or other place in which spirituous, vinous, malt, or intoxicating liquors are kept, sold, disposed of, or given away, and the selling, disposing of, furnishing, or giving away spirituous, vinous, malt, or intoxicating liquors,' without first having procured a license therefor from the city council of the City of Ashland, Oregon,” approved March 12, 1901, by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex parte CowertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Burnside v. Lincoln County CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
- Harbaugh v. City of MonmouthIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- City of Portland v. SchmidtOregon Supreme Court · 1885
- State v. HanleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sandys v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1905