Legal Opinion

F. A. North Co. v. Seigel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1929No. Appeal 43Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

P. A. North Company, the appellant, leased to William Spriggs, on May 6, 1926, a piano. Notice was given under the Act of 1876 to Harry Spriggs, the owner of the demised premises. On January 24, 1928, Harry Spriggs sold the premises to Harry Siegel, one of the appellees. On October 3,1928, John Hawthorne, a constable, levied upon the piano under a distress warrant issued by Harry Siegel for rent in arrears in the sum of $80, and, as a result, this present action in replevin was instituted by the plaintiff. The court below directed a verdict for Siegel for the rent due…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curry v. Bacharach Quality Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. McGeary v. MellorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
  3. Mace v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API