Alexander v. Munroe
Oregon Supreme Court
Suit by Jessie Alexander against Edith Munroe and others, in which Zera Snow and others filed cross-bills, to enforce a partial assignment of a judgment and to foreclose mortgages. From a judgment granting relief as prayed for in the cross-bills, defendant, Edith Munroe, appeals. Statement by Mr. Justice Eakin.
Read the full summary
Suit by Jessie Alexander against Edith Munroe and others, in which Zera Snow and others filed cross-bills, to enforce a partial assignment of a judgment and to foreclose mortgages. From a judgment granting relief as prayed for in the cross-bills, defendant, Edith Munroe, appeals. Statement by Mr. Justice Eakin. Jackson Munroe, in a divorce suit against defendant, Edith Munroe, besides the decree of divorce, recovered a judgment for the sum of $1,487, rendered July 21, 1891. Pending that suit, Edith Munroe conveyed to her mother, Margaret Vedder, and another, in fraud of Jackson Munroe, the…
1Opinion
On Petition for Rehearing.
[103 Pac. 514.]
2Opinion of the CourtJustice Eakin
11. Counsel for defendant, Edith Munroe, urges that the decree of the lower court is erroneous to the extent *513that it includes a personal judgment against her for the sum of $2,357.45 due Huston & Snow. As the whole relief sought by Huston & Snow grows out of the decree in the creditors’ suit, of date July 19, 1894, and. as the decree in that suit was evidently not intended to operate as a personal judgment against Edith Munroe, but only a determination of the amount due, for the purpose of settling the extent of the liability of the property involved…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Bowman v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1909