The Armer Texas Trust v. Brazell
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOOMEY, Judge:
¶1 The Appellants seek reversal of the district court’s order denying them leave to amend their complaint and determining that their complaint lacked particularity under rule 9(c) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. 2 We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 The Appellants are individuals and entities who allegedly invested approximately two million dollars in various In-Store Broadcasting Network entities. They claimed these investments were induced by the misrepresentations of the Appellees (collectively, IBN). .
¶3 In their initial complaint and subsequent amended complaints, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Coroles v. SabeyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Angel Investors, LLC v. GarrityUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Golden Meadows Properties, LC v. StrandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- Carlton v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Segment Consulting Management v. Streamline ManufacturingDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020