Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 2020No. E073871Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 5/26/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO E073871 In re TOM SMITH (Super.Ct.No. FSB802363) on Habeas Corpus. OPINION ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS: Petition for writ of habeas corpus. Kyle S. Brodie and Gregory S. Tavill, Judges.1 Petition denied. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE: Granted in part, denied in part. Michael B. Petersen and Paula M. Mitchell, Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent, for Petitioner. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API