London v. State

Appellant, Vasilyn London, appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of sexual battery and one count of burglary of a dwelling. On appeal, London raises two issues. We affirm.

Appellant first argues that the trial court erred in limiting his direct examination of one of the investigators with regard to the victim’s description of the sexual assault. Specifically, Appellant contends that the court prevented him from eliciting testimony that the victim described the attack as brutal (in contrast to her physical injuries) when the court sustained the State’s objection to the defense’s…