B.J.H. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
*946ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PALMER, J.
We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion dated May 31, 2005, and issue this revised opinion in its place.
We affirm this case based upon S.S.M. v. State, 898 So.2d 84 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). As in V.K.E. v. State, 902 So.2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as being a matter of great public importance:
WHETHER THE CIRCUIT COURT HAS THE AUTHORITY IN DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS TO IMPOSE THE MANDATORY SURCHARGES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 938.08 AND 938.085 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES.
AFFIRMED; QUESTION…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- V.K.E. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- S.S.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3Cited by6 opinions
- R.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- B.J.H. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- B.J.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- BJH v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- BJH v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.