Legal Opinion
Ellis v. Caprice
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 14, 1967PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
50 N.J. 409 (1967)
HOWARD ELLIS, ADMR., ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER,
v.
ROSE CAPRICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
PATRICIA ELLIS, INFANT, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER,
v.
ROSE CAPRICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
November 14, 1967.
Messrs. Harkavy & Lieb, for the defendants-petitioners, cross-respondents.
Messrs. Baker, Garber, Chazen & Duffy, and Mr. Irving J. Rosenberg for the plaintiffs-respondents, cross-petitioners.
Denied.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Bortz v. RammelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Horbal v. McNeilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Gaido v. WeiserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Linebaugh by and Through Linebaugh v. HyndmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Gentle v. Pine Valley ApartmentsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.