Wilkin Manufacturing Co. v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Iosco. (Simpson, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Plaintiff brought suit for the claimed balance due it from the defendant for certain mill machinery, amounting to $1,944.38. On the trial plaintiff had verdict and judgment for an amount considerably less than the amount claimed. Defendant brings error.
Plaintiff, to make its case, on the trial produced the *159items of machinery furnished, and proved their value, as -an admission of the defendant as to the indebtedness.
The defendant, with its plea of the general issue, gave notice that the machinery was purchased under a special ■contract, by the terms of which the plaintiff was to manufacture…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Johnson v. StephensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anderson v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Phelps v. GoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Beiseker v. AmbersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Jules Levy & Bro. v. A. Mautz & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Cal Hirsch & Sons Iron & Rail Co. v. Peru Steel Casting Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.