Legal Opinion

Ehorn v. Abandoned Shipwreck

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 9, 2004No. Nos. 02-3852, 02-4234, 03-1290Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order

On remand after Ehorn v. Sunken vessel known as the “Rosinco, ” 294 F.3d 856 (7th Cir.2002), the state at last received proper notice of Ehorn’s claim. It responded that the vessel had been listed on the National Register of Historic Places and thus belongs to the state under 43 U.S.C. § 2105(a)(3). The district court agreed and entered judgment in Wisconsin’s favor.

Ehorn does not deny that this is an accurate application of the statute. Instead he insists that giving the state the benefit of the 2001 inclusion violates the due process clause, because its initial response to Ehorn’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Paul L. Ehorn v. Sunken Vessel Known as the "Rosinco," Her Tackle, Appurtenances, Furnishings, and Cargo, Appeal Of: State of Wisconsin, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API