Legal Opinion

Brown v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 24, 1949Published

1Per curiam

In the type of premises here in question, defendant landlord under the circumstances disclosed was as a matter of law under no liability in tort to plaintiff, an invitee at the time of the occurrence of the sublessee in occupation and control of that part of the premises where the accident happened, and defendant’s motion for dismissal should have been granted (Fink v. 37 West 36th St. Co., 277 N. Y. 703, revg. 251 App. Div. 261; Cullings v. Goetz, 256 N. Y. 287, 292).

In view of this disposition of the appeal, we need not now pass upon other points urged for reversal based on other errors in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cullings v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Fink v. 37 West 36th Street CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Fink v. 37 West 36th Street Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API