Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1932No. 3198PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit brought in the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore, upon a bond given by the appellant as surety for Harmon L. Remrnel dated November 4, 1925, and conditioned upon the faithful performance of his duties as disbursing agent. The principal on the bond had, for some time prior to the execution thereof, held the position of collector of internal revenue, and, in accordance with USCA, title 26, § 16, he had been duly appointed disbursing agent. The bond in suit is the one required by that section.

The items sued for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Campbell Fed. Prohibition Administrator v. Galeno Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. United States v. SymondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. McShane v. Howard BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  5. United States v. GaussenSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. People's Bank of SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  2. Zukaitis v. FitzgeraldDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1936
  3. People's Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1933
  4. United States v. HellerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API