Legal Opinion

Daytona Beach Shores v. State ex rel. Membery

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 15, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNAL, Justice.

Appellants, who were respondents below in a quo warranto proceeding, seek reversal of a final judgment of ouster entered by the trial judge.

*258The point to be determined is whether the appellants met the procedural requirements of Section 165.04, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., in organizing the town of Daytona Beach Shores.

Pursuant to- notice previously given certain freeholders and registered voters held a meeting to organize the town of Daytona Beach Shores. It is admitted that there were at least 188 qualified freeholders living in the area proposed to be incorporated. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farrington v. FloodSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  2. Heyward v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. South Peninsula Zoning Commission v. StonerSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1991
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API