Legal Opinion

Lee v. Mayfield

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1967No. 10777Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Judge.

This case was consolidated with Lee v. Sanders et al., La.App., 197 So.2d 371.

Since defendant Mrs. Joseph Mabry May-field has not perfected an appeal, the judgment of the lower court as it affects her is not before us. For the reasons assigned in Lee v. Sanders, supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed and recast at appellants’ cost, and

It is ordered that plaintiffs, Beulah Lee and David Lee, have the right to the possession of and are hereby maintained in possession of:

Lot 3, Block E, Mooring Partition, Section 10, Township 19 North, Range 16 West, Caddo Parish, Louisiana,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lee v. SandersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API