Legal Opinion

State v. Sauter

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1925No. File No. 5526PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, P. J.

In this case the defendants John Pfaff, Katie Pfaff, and Henry Sauter were tried for murder. Separate trial was not requested by either of them, and they were all put upon trial together. Julius Skaug and T. C. Burns appeared as counsel for all the defendants. After the trial had been in progress one on more days these attorneys, announced to the court that facts had come to their knowledge that made it impossible for them longer to jproperly represent all the defendants, and that they wished to withdraw as counsel for defendant Sauter. Immediate 'steps were taken to secure other counsel for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. La PlantDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1911

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clarence Ernest Beardslee, A/K/A Clarence Everett Beardslee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. Lafferty v. State Ex Rel. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Application of De MarriasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Wood v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Kills Plenty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API