Legal Opinion

In Re Glavich

California Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1925No. Docket No. Crim. 2825PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was convicted in the justice’s court of a violation of the Wright Act (Stats. 1921, p. 79), in that he unlawfully had in his possession certain intoxicating liquor containing more than the legal alcoholic content. The judgment and sentence of the court was that petitioner “pay a fine of five hundred dollars or be imprisoned in the county jail five hundred days.” He is now in custody under the commitment issued on the judgment. The point of his application for release on a writ of habeas corpus is, that under section 29 of title…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re HuewittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Jones v. Police Court of AlhambraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. MacKelprang v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API