Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 15, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

The defendants, C. A. Boyd and Charles Hill, have appealed from a decree rendered in the chancery court of Lake county, Tennessee, against them jointly in favor of the complainant, the W. T. Rawleigh Company.

The complainant’s bill was based upon a eonti'act executed by C. A. Boyd, designated as buyer, wherein the buyer agreed to purchase of complainant, who was designated as seller, at wholesale prices, such of complainant’s manufactured products as the seller should determine to sell to the said buyer.

Complainant is a manufacturing concern, located at Freeport, Illinois. The buyer agreed to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. of Winona v. CoombesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Rawleigh Co. v. RoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Saginaw Medicine Co. v. BateyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Gordon v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API