W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
The defendants, C. A. Boyd and Charles Hill, have appealed from a decree rendered in the chancery court of Lake county, Tennessee, against them jointly in favor of the complainant, the W. T. Rawleigh Company.
The complainant’s bill was based upon a eonti'act executed by C. A. Boyd, designated as buyer, wherein the buyer agreed to purchase of complainant, who was designated as seller, at wholesale prices, such of complainant’s manufactured products as the seller should determine to sell to the said buyer.
Complainant is a manufacturing concern, located at Freeport, Illinois. The buyer agreed to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- J. R. Watkins Medical Co. of Winona v. CoombesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Rawleigh Co. v. RoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Saginaw Medicine Co. v. BateyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Gordon v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.