Legal Opinion

Jaynes v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 2, 2016No. 15-1342PPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOUTER, Associate Justice.

Charles Jaynes appeals the district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. None of Jaynes’s five claims entitles him to habeas relief, and we affirm.

I

In the summer of 1997, Jaynes, an adult man, befriended Jeffrey Curley, a ten-year-old boy, whom Jaynes often saw in his Massachusetts neighborhood. Jaynes drove a Cadillac and several times took Curley for rides without his parents’ knowledge. At one point, Jaynes bought a bicycle and promised to give it to Curley. Jaynes’s object in gaining Curley’s confidence was to engage him…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. Walker v. MedeirosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  3. Caniglia v. StromCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  4. Johnston v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  5. Hudson v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API