Legal Opinion
Garner v. Garner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 4, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*709The petitioner father contends that the Family Court failed to take the appropriate measures to protect his right to assigned counsel pursuant to Family Court Act § 262 (a) (see generally Matter of Casey N., 59 AD3d 625 [2009]). However, the issue cannot be resolved on the record provided to this Court since it does not contain a transcript for the proceedings held on July 29, 2009. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Family Court, Queens County, for a reconstruction hearing with respect to those proceedings conducted in the above-entitled case before Court Attorney Referee Francine…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Casey N.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Remy v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Olson v. OlsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Hall v. LadsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Jordal v. JordalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Naquan L.G. (Carolyn C.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Gabrielle N. (Jacqueline T.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Chu Man Woo v. Qiong Yun XiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Garner v. GarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Chu Man Woo v. Qiong Yun XiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012