Legal Opinion

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2006No. 76284-8Published

1Dissent

*426¶47 (dissenting) — Appellants Kenneth and Barbara Miller had their property condemned by the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) contrary to requirements of public notice and without Sound Transit proving the public necessity of the condemnation. Sound Transit contented itself by solely posting the meeting agenda on its web site rather than notifying the owner and public through publication in a local newspaper or through posting on the property or in other public places, as the statute envisions. The Internet posting did not even specify which lots were considered…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Deaconess Hospital v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. City of Tacoma v. WelckerWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Healy Lumber Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. In Re Petition of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Nisqually Delta Ass'n v. City of DuPontWashington Supreme Court · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API