Legal Opinion

Rager v. Maxon Shirt Company

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1954No. 18430PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

1. While garnishment proceedings are purely statutory and cannot be extended to cases not enumerated in the statute, or to doubtful cases, and courts cannot enlarge the remedy, under the statute of this State, summons of garnishment can issue “in cases where suit shall be pending.” Code (Ann. Supp.) § 46-101; Davis v. Millen, 111 Ga. 451, 452 (36 S. E. 803); Weston v. Beverly & McCollum, 10 Ga. App. 261 (73 S. E. 404); Anderson v. Ledbetter-Johnson Contractors, 62 Ga. App. 732 (9 S. E. 2d 860).

Argued January 13, 1954 Decided February 9, 1954 Rehearing denied February 24,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McClendon & Co. v. Hernando Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. McFarland v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Bridger v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. RaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Cherry v. North & South RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Summer v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Worsham Bros. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Kirchman v. KirchmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API