Carstens Bros. v. Frye-Bruhn & Co.

BROWN, District Judge.

This action was tried to a jury, and, after having retired to consider their verdict, they returned into court, and presented their verdict, which is in the following form:

“We, the jury, duly impaneled and sworn in the above-entitled cause, find for the defendant, Frye-Bruhn and Company.

“Frank E. Burns, JForeman.”

A motion for a new trial was filed in due time, one of the grounds of which, among others, is as follows:

“The verdict of the jury rendered herein is defective, and incapable of supporting a judgment, in that it does not dispose of the issues as *141to the…