Legal Opinion

Nalezenec v. Blue Cross of Western New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff John Nalezenec and plaintiffs intestate Nellie Nalezenec were insured by the Blue Cross Over 65 Limited Hospital Coverage Contract and the Blue Shield Over 65 Limited Medical Coverage Contract. The major medical expense rider to the basic contracts provides that the insurer will pay for care in a skilled nursing facility under certain circumstances, but will "not pay for any days of care in a skilled nursing facility when, in our sole judgment, your condition did not require skilled nursing facility care on a continuing basis.”

Nel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State v. Avco Financial Service of New York Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Mandel v. LiebmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Zuckerberg v. CrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Zuckerberg v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leasing v. BarlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Nalezenec v. Blue Cross of Western New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Divito v. FiandachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  4. Rome Gas, Inc. v. Fastrac Props. I, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API