Legal Opinion

People v. Welch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. Contrary to the contention of defendant, the State Trooper had probable cause to arrest him for driving while intoxicated based on his slurred speech; the odor of an alcoholic beverage in his vehicle; his bloodshot, watery eyes; his admission that he had been drinking; and his inability to perform one or more of the field sobriety tests (see, People v D’Augustino, 272 AD2d 914, 914-915, lv denied 95 NY2d 851; People v Schroeder, 229 AD2d 917, 917-918). The sentence, which was agreed upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SchroederAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. D'AugustinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ChelenzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API