Legal Opinion

Processed Minerals, Inc. v. AMF Tuboscope, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 26, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Since there are several questions of fact which can be resolved only at trial, it was improper to grant plaintiff summary judgment on the issue of liability. It cannot be determined on this record whether the shipments of garnet from plaintiff to defendant were made pursuant to the written purchase and sale agreement between the parties, or pursuant to a separate oral agreement under which defendant was to test garnet of varying specifications before the written contract became effective. The record can be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Graulich Caterer Inc. v. Hans HolterboschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Phil Jacobs Co. v. MifflinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hubbard v. UTZ Quality Foods, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API