Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. City of Danville

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 5, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Debt, on a saloon keeper’s bond. Trial in the Circuit Court of Vermilion County; the Hon. Ferdinand Bookwalter, Judge, presiding. Judgment for plaintiff on demurrer to pleas. Error by defendants.

Read the full summary

Debt, on a saloon keeper’s bond. Trial in the Circuit Court of Vermilion County; the Hon. Ferdinand Bookwalter, Judge, presiding. Judgment for plaintiff on demurrer to pleas. Error by defendants. The city of Danville, Illinois, sued Albert B. Jenkins, Albert Goetz and Gus Flick, in the Circuit Court of Vermilion County, in an action for debt; the declaration charged that A. B. Jenkins' applied for and was granted a license to keep a dram-shop in the city of Danville, in accordance with the ordinance of the city, which provided that before such license should be granted the person applying…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burroughs

By the pleadings the facts disclosed in this case are, that Albert Jenkins obtained from the city of Danville a license to keep a dram-shop in that city. In addition to the statutory bond, the city required of him and he gave the bond sued upon, which was in the penal sum of $1,000, agreed to be liquidated damages, conditional that Jenkins would observe and keep all the ordinances of the city. There was an ordinance of the city prohibiting the keeping open of dram-shops on Sunday and prescribing a penalty for its violation of not less than $50, nor more than $200. Jenkins violated that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API