Legal Opinion

Charles H. Demarest, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 26, 1968No. C.D. 3494Published

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

This suit has been submitted for decision on the following agreement between counsel for the respective parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiffs and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the items marked “A” and initialed EMR (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner E. M. Rootvik (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the above enumerated protest assessed with duty at 16%% under Paragraph 412, Tariff Act of 1930, consists of collapsable peel chairs similar in all material respects to the collapsable peel chairs, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shelford, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API