People v. Lopez
New York Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTitone, J.
In People v Baskerville (60 NY2d 374), this court held that the "[d]isplay[ing] what appears to be a * * * firearm” element of first and second degree robbery (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]; § 160.10 [2] [b]) has both a subjective and an objective component. Further, the court stated in Baskerville that the objective component has two subparts. First, "[t]he defendant must consciously display something that could reasonably be perceived as a firearm” (60 NY2d, at 381, supra). Second, "the display must actually be witnessed in some manner by the victim” (id.). While alluding to this two-pronged…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BaskervilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. HedgemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. FelderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- People v. ColavitoNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.