Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Lopez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1989Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTitone, J.

In People v Baskerville (60 NY2d 374), this court held that the "[d]isplay[ing] what appears to be a * * * firearm” element of first and second degree robbery (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]; § 160.10 [2] [b]) has both a subjective and an objective component. Further, the court stated in Baskerville that the objective component has two subparts. First, "[t]he defendant must consciously display something that could reasonably be perceived as a firearm” (60 NY2d, at 381, supra). Second, "the display must actually be witnessed in some manner by the victim” (id.). While alluding to this two-pronged…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. BaskervilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. HedgemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. FelderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. People v. ColavitoNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API