Legal Opinion

Hirano v. Hirano

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 2, 2008No. B190190PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Alan Hirano and defendant and respondent Donald Hirano are brothers. Appellant sued respondent for, among other things, conversion and trespass. We reversed a prior judgment entered against appellant (Hirano v. Hirano (Sept. 29, 2004, B167066) [nonpub. opn.]). The current appeal is from a judgment entered after the trial court granted respondent’s midtrial motion for nonsuit, the basis of which was that appellant could not prove damages. Appellant contends the judgment must be reversed because the trial court improperly excluded evidence of damages…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bonds v. RoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Fairmont Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of Riverside Cty.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Beverly Hospital v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Guzman v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. West Hills Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pina v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Austin v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  3. Banga v. KaniosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Capital Express Lines, Inc. v. Chase Bank, N.ADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Carlton v. AmGuard Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API